If the Shipowner has failed to carry out a term of a time charter-party whereby he undertakes to maintain the vessel in a seaworthy state，this only（）the Charterer to sue him for damages，and not to repudiate the charter-party.

We must take the Charterer’s benefit（）full consideration．

In modern times，the work of stowage is generally deputed to stevedores，but that does not generally relieve the shipowners（）their duties even though the stevedores are，under the charter-party，to be appointed by the Charterers．

Unless otherwise agreed，（）must take the goods from alongside，though this obligation may be varied by a custom of the port which is not inconsistent with the express terms of the contract.

The Charterer is entitled to the benefit of the excepted perils during the transit of the goods from storing place to the actual place of loading，provided such transit substantially （）part of the operation of loading.

The owner is not at liberty to leave the port of call as soon as the time specified in the charter-party has elapsed，though the Charterer may，if the contract so provides，be liable to compensate（）for the delay．

The carrier is the owner or Charterer who enters into a contract with（）.

If the Shipowner makes an innocent misrepresentation which induces the Charterer to sign the contract，the Charterer may be entitled to（）the charter-party.

To render the（）liable，the shipowners must show that the proximate cause of the detention or expense was trading to a river with a bar or to a port with a bar.

The Shipowner must not stow goods on deck（）there is a trade usage to that effect or the Charterer has given his express or implied consent.