When a vessel violates the oil pollution laws，who may be held responsible?（）

The Shipowner is not（）by the fact that a remote cause of the loss was an excepted peril.

The Shipowner may do what is reasonable（）any of these liens in view of the fact that they are possessory liens，i.e. they can only be enforced by retaining actual or constructive possession of the cargo.

To earn lump sum freight，either（）must complete the voyage，or else the cargo must be transshipped，or forwarded by some means other than the ship in which it was originally loaded，and delivered by the Shipowner or his agents at its destination.

Unless the Shipowner carries the goods to the destination agreed on，he（）entitled to anypart of the freight.

The Shipowner’s right of the lien can（）against all goods consigned to the same person on the same voyage，even under different bills of lading，but not against goods on different voyages under different contracts.

The claim for dead freight being a claim for damages for breach of contract，the Shipowner is under a duty，where the Charterer fails to load a full and complete cargo，（）the damage by obtaining other cargo，provided he acts reasonably in so doing.

If，by refusing to name a place of discharge，the Charterer prevents the Shipowner from earning freight，（）will have to pay it as damages for breach of contract.

The Owners to take over and pay all fuel remaining in the Vessel’s bunkers on re-delivery at current price at the port of redelivery，or at the nearest main bunkering port，if the bunker price at the port of redelivery is not available. This indicates that the Owners are to take over and pay the remaining bunkers（）.

When a vessel violates an oil pollution act，who may be held responsible?（）.