The claim for dead freight being a claim for damages for breach of contract，the Shipowner is under a duty，where the Charterer fails to load a full and complete cargo，（）the damage by obtaining other cargo，provided he acts reasonably in so doing.

If the master has acted unreasonably，e.g. knowing of the danger in the port has still proceeded to enter it，and danger results，the Charterer will（）.

The reason for the obligation to load a full cargo（）that otherwise the Shipowner would lose freight on account of some part of the ship’s carrying capacity not being utilized.

The Shipowner is under a duty to（）the vessel to the port of loading even though it is impossible for her to get there by the canceling date．

Where normal delivery at the port of destination is prevented by some cause beyond the control of the master，and the master may and must deal with the cargo for the benefit of its owners by landing it，carrying it，or transshipping it，as may seem best，the Shipowner may then charge the cargo owners with（）to cover the expenses thus incurred in their interests.

If the redelivery of a vessel is delayed by causes （），hire is payable at the charter rate until redelivery even though the market rate may have gone up or down.

Where a charter-party specifies the estimated time of arrival of a vessel at the port of loading，there is（）obligation on the shipowners to sail to there on the date on which when proceeding with all convenient speed it would normally reach the port on or about the estimated date of arrival.

When a vessel violates an oil pollution act，who may be held responsible?（）.

The Shipowner is not（）by the fact that a remote cause of the loss was an excepted peril.

To earn lump sum freight，either（）must complete the voyage，or else the cargo must be transshipped，or forwarded by some means other than the ship in which it was originally loaded，and delivered by the Shipowner or his agents at its destination.