It is not the Charterer’s duty that（）.

The right to limit liability in connection with the ship（）also extended to Charterers and any person interested in or in possession of the vessel and，in particular，any manager or operator of her.

The master’s authority to act in the interests of the cargo owner is part of his general authorityas servant of the Shipowner，and therefore（）will be liable if the master abuses his powers.

If the vessel does not arrive by the canceling date，and the Charterer（）expenses，these expenses can be claimed by him from the Shipowner where they are in the reasonable contemplation of the parties.

The owner is not at liberty to leave the port of call as soon as the time specified in the charter-party has elapsed，though the Charterer may，if the contract so provides，be liable to compensate（）for the delay．

Should it appear that war or blockade would prevent the vessel from safely reaching the port of destination and / or discharging the goods thereat，the Carrier（）.

That the Shipowner has broken a condition precedent will（）the Charterer from the liability to provide a cargo.

If the Shipowner proves that prima facie the cause of damage was excepted，the burden ofproof shifts to（）.

If the Shipowner has failed to carry out a term of a time charter-party whereby he undertakes to maintain the vessel in a seaworthy state，this only（）the Charterer to sue him for damages，and not to repudiate the charter-party.

If the Shipowner agrees to the voyage originally ordered by the Charterer，he is entitled to be paid hire（）for the excess period.